In this November's mid-term elections, the Democratic Party will be focused on winning back the governorships and legislatures in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. They lost decisively in these battleground states in 2010, giving Republicans the opportunity to institute far-reaching changes in programs, benefits, and regulations that for generations had provided economic security for the middle class.
As Democrats are currently debating their 2014 electoral strategies, not a week passes without an article appearing arguing what the party must do to regain lost ground in these critical states. Some Democrats make the case for doubling down on increasing voter turnout among those constituencies that have become the new base vote of the party: youth, African Americans, Latinos, Asians, and professional/educated women. They make the case that this approach worked for President Obama in 2008 and 2012 and so if these same groups can be energized again in the mid-term contests, Democrats can win in 2014. But although Obama won these same states in 2008 and 2012, it doesn't automatically convey that Democrats will win them in a non-presidential election year. National contests mobilize different voters than local races, and so it cannot be assumed that those who voted for President Obama will vote for a Democrat or even vote at all in more localized contests.
While I fully agree that these groups should be energized, I also believe that Democrats cannot afford to ignore the importance of reaching out to other groups of voters who can provide the margin of victory, especially in these important states.
According to the 2010 Census, over one-third of all residents in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are immigrants or the descendants of immigrants from European and Mediterranean countries. Many retain a strong attachment to their heritage, belong to ethnic organizations and churches, and remain connected through their ethnic media. Many of them also have deep roots in the labor movement and in the Democratic party.
A decade ago, based on polling conducted by my brother John Zogby, I wrote "What Ethic Americans Really Think." What we found was that these ethnic voters embrace values that are at once progressive and traditional. They are progressive on the role of government in public education, health care, Social Security, and protecting the minimum wage and labor standards. At the same time, they are traditional in their attachment to their families, their heritage, and their communities.
These ethnic voters were once core constituents of the Democratic party, but along the way, we stopped talking to them and directing our message to them. As a result, we lost their support.
This disconnect came through quite clearly for me one night in 1984 at the National Italian American Foundation Gala in Washington, DC. The evening featured speeches by Walter Mondale and Ronald Reagan.
Mondale spoke first. His speech had nine applause lines -- most came when he mentioned the name of his running mate, Geraldine Ferraro. The rest of the speech was a litany of issues and pledges, as in: "I'm for the teachers..." and "I'm for unions..."
Ronald Reagan came next and after a pause began something like this:
"My grandmother, like yours, came to this country with nothing but her hopes and dreams. She worked her fingers to the bone, believing in the promise of America that some day one of her own could run for president of this great country. I stand before you the beneficiary of her hard work, the fulfillment of her dreams."
I left that night knowing that Reagan would win the Italian vote -- and he did. And I left troubled because the speech he gave was one that Democrats had given when I was growing up. It evoked themes of family, heritage, hard work and the values and promise of America. It represented the messages we had lost.
In reality, Mondale had the better program to ensure progress for middle class ethnic voters. But he wasn't talking to them in language that showed he understood their identity and their values. Over the years, the disconnect has only grown.
This November, Democrats will have chance to reconnect with these ethnic voters and win support from them while still courting other key groups. It is not an either-or proposition. Immigration reform, expanding health care coverage, creating good jobs, promoting women's rights for equal pay and opportunity, improving public education, and protecting workers rights are issues that affect us all.
We just have to broaden our appeal and expand our base by speaking directly to older immigrant groups, as well as to newer immigrants -- white ethnics, as well as African Americans and Latinos.
European and Mediterranean want to be recognized and respected. And because they are connected through their churches, clubs, and media it's not that difficult to reach them. If we stop treating ethnic voters as if they were an undefined mass and speak to them as descendants of Irish, Italian, Polish, Ukrainian, Greek, and Lebanese immigrants whose history we celebrate and whose values we embrace, we can win them back. They were once Democratic voters and there is no reason why they can't be again.
As Democrats are currently debating their 2014 electoral strategies, not a week passes without an article appearing arguing what the party must do to regain lost ground in these critical states. Some Democrats make the case for doubling down on increasing voter turnout among those constituencies that have become the new base vote of the party: youth, African Americans, Latinos, Asians, and professional/educated women. They make the case that this approach worked for President Obama in 2008 and 2012 and so if these same groups can be energized again in the mid-term contests, Democrats can win in 2014. But although Obama won these same states in 2008 and 2012, it doesn't automatically convey that Democrats will win them in a non-presidential election year. National contests mobilize different voters than local races, and so it cannot be assumed that those who voted for President Obama will vote for a Democrat or even vote at all in more localized contests.
While I fully agree that these groups should be energized, I also believe that Democrats cannot afford to ignore the importance of reaching out to other groups of voters who can provide the margin of victory, especially in these important states.
According to the 2010 Census, over one-third of all residents in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are immigrants or the descendants of immigrants from European and Mediterranean countries. Many retain a strong attachment to their heritage, belong to ethnic organizations and churches, and remain connected through their ethnic media. Many of them also have deep roots in the labor movement and in the Democratic party.
A decade ago, based on polling conducted by my brother John Zogby, I wrote "What Ethic Americans Really Think." What we found was that these ethnic voters embrace values that are at once progressive and traditional. They are progressive on the role of government in public education, health care, Social Security, and protecting the minimum wage and labor standards. At the same time, they are traditional in their attachment to their families, their heritage, and their communities.
These ethnic voters were once core constituents of the Democratic party, but along the way, we stopped talking to them and directing our message to them. As a result, we lost their support.
This disconnect came through quite clearly for me one night in 1984 at the National Italian American Foundation Gala in Washington, DC. The evening featured speeches by Walter Mondale and Ronald Reagan.
Mondale spoke first. His speech had nine applause lines -- most came when he mentioned the name of his running mate, Geraldine Ferraro. The rest of the speech was a litany of issues and pledges, as in: "I'm for the teachers..." and "I'm for unions..."
Ronald Reagan came next and after a pause began something like this:
"My grandmother, like yours, came to this country with nothing but her hopes and dreams. She worked her fingers to the bone, believing in the promise of America that some day one of her own could run for president of this great country. I stand before you the beneficiary of her hard work, the fulfillment of her dreams."
I left that night knowing that Reagan would win the Italian vote -- and he did. And I left troubled because the speech he gave was one that Democrats had given when I was growing up. It evoked themes of family, heritage, hard work and the values and promise of America. It represented the messages we had lost.
In reality, Mondale had the better program to ensure progress for middle class ethnic voters. But he wasn't talking to them in language that showed he understood their identity and their values. Over the years, the disconnect has only grown.
This November, Democrats will have chance to reconnect with these ethnic voters and win support from them while still courting other key groups. It is not an either-or proposition. Immigration reform, expanding health care coverage, creating good jobs, promoting women's rights for equal pay and opportunity, improving public education, and protecting workers rights are issues that affect us all.
We just have to broaden our appeal and expand our base by speaking directly to older immigrant groups, as well as to newer immigrants -- white ethnics, as well as African Americans and Latinos.
European and Mediterranean want to be recognized and respected. And because they are connected through their churches, clubs, and media it's not that difficult to reach them. If we stop treating ethnic voters as if they were an undefined mass and speak to them as descendants of Irish, Italian, Polish, Ukrainian, Greek, and Lebanese immigrants whose history we celebrate and whose values we embrace, we can win them back. They were once Democratic voters and there is no reason why they can't be again.